R2 Solutions LLC v. Target Corp.
| R2 Solutions LLC |
| Target Corp. |
| 4:2021cv00092 |
| January 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Target Corp. to 4/2/2021. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(mcg) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re R2 Solutions LLC.( Nelson, Edward) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Marcus Hill Brakefield on behalf of R2 Solutions LLC (Brakefield, Marcus) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher G Granaghan on behalf of R2 Solutions LLC (Granaghan, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrew J Wright on behalf of R2 Solutions LLC (Wright, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Target Corp. (rpc, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (rpc, ) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Brent Nelson Bumgardner on behalf of R2 Solutions LLC (Bumgardner, Brent) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by R2 Solutions LLC identifying Corporate Parent Acacia Research Corporation, Corporate Parent Acacia Research Group LLC for R2 Solutions LLC. (Nelson, Edward) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Nelson, Edward) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Target Corp. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8224836.), filed by R2 Solutions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6)(Nelson, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: R2 Solutions LLC v. Target Corp. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: R2 Solutions LLC | |
| Represented By: | Brent Nelson Bumgardner |
| Represented By: | Edward R Nelson, III |
| Represented By: | Marcus Hill Brakefield |
| Represented By: | Christopher G Granaghan |
| Represented By: | Andrew J Wright |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target Corp. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
