Adams v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Michael Kevin Adams
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 4:2021cv00207
Filed: March 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sean D Jordan
Referring Judge: Christine A Nowak
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - HABEAS PETITION - STATE. Respondent to file response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Copy of order to Edward Marshall and Laura Haney via electronic noticing including petition and any supporting documents.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 3/22/2021. (rpc, )
March 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 3/22/2021. (rpc, )
March 22, 2021 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 6-56136 (mll, )
March 19, 2021 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (daj, )
March 19, 2021 Case assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan and referred to Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak. (daj, )
March 18, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Brett Evan Ordiway on behalf of Michael Kevin Adams (Ordiway, Brett)
March 18, 2021 Filing 3 BRIEF filed in Support of Petition for Relief from a Conviction by a Person in State Custody by Michael Kevin Adams. (Udashen, Robert)
March 18, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to File Brief Exceeding 30 Pages in Support of Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 by Michael Kevin Adams. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Udashen, Robert)
March 18, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus By A Person In State Custody, filed by Michael Kevin Adams.(Udashen, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adams v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Represented By: Edward Larry Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Kevin Adams
Represented By: Robert Nathan Udashen
Represented By: Brett Evan Ordiway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?