Brown v. The Reny Company
| Chelsa Brown |
| The Reny Company |
| 4:2021cv00395 |
| May 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Kimberly C Priest Johnson |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 37
Additional Attachments to Main Document: #32 Response in Opposition to Motion. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B, #2 Exhibit C, #3 Exhibit C (Sealed Medical Records), #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J)(mcg)
|
|
Filing 36
REPLY to Response to Motion re #29 MOTION to Strike #17 MOTION for Summary Judgment Evidence filed by The Reny Company. (Lambert, Arthur)
|
|
Filing 35
NOTICE of Initial Disclosure by Chelsa Brown (mem)
|
|
Filing 34
SCHEDULING ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/30/2022 at 09:00 AM in Ctrm 208 (Sherman) before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III. Amended Pleadings due by 10/5/2021. Discovery due by 12/28/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 8/24/2021. Jury instructions due by 6/16/2022. Mediation Completion due by 1/25/2022. Designation of Mediator due by 12/14/2021. Motions due by 1/18/2022. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 5/31/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 7/15/2021. (mem, )
|
|
Filing 33
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve her initial disclosures on or before July 23, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 7/15/2021. (mem)
|
|
Filing 32
RESPONSE in Opposition re #29 MOTION to Strike #17 MOTION for Summary Judgment Evidence filed by Chelsa Brown. (rpc, )
|
|
Filing 31
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference held on 7/13/2021. Attorney Appearances: PChelsa Brown, Pro Se Plaintiff did not appear; Arthur V. Lambert, Brent D. Sedge. (time in court: 10:05 -10:09) (Court Reporter Digital.) (jwam, )
|
|
Filing 30
Additional Attachments to Main Document: #28 Response in Opposition to Motion.. (Lambert, Arthur)
|
|
Filing 29
MOTION to Strike #17 MOTION for Summary Judgment Evidence by The Reny Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lambert, Arthur)
|
|
Filing 28
RESPONSE in Opposition re #17 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The Reny Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lambert, Arthur)
|
|
Filing 27
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Scheduling Order Deadlines)(Lambert, Arthur)
|
|
Filing 26
First Amended ANSWER to #16 Amended Complaint by The Reny Company.(Lambert, Arthur)
|
|
Filing 25
ORDER. The live pleading is the First Amended Complaint #16 . Accordingly, Reny's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #7 ) and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #14 ) are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 7/1/2021. (rpc, )
|
|
Filing 24
OBJECTION to Response to Motion re #14 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Chelsa Brown. (mem)
|
|
Filing 23
ANSWER to #16 Amended Complaint by The Reny Company.(Lambert, Arthur)
|
|
Filing 22
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by The Reny Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lambert, Arthur)
|
|
Filing 21
Additional Attachments to Main Document: #16 Amended Complaint filed by Chelsa Brown. (mem)
|
|
Filing 20
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Chelsa Brown as to #13 Order. (rpc, )
|
|
Filing 19
RESPONSE to Motion re #14 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The Reny Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Lambert, Arthur)
|
|
Filing 18
SEALED ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to Main Document: #17 MOTION for Summary Judgment. (rpc, )
|
|
Filing 17
FIRST AMENDED MOTION for Summary Judgment by Chelsa Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit A-1, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit B-1, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit E, #9 Exhibit F, #10 Exhibit G)(rpc, )
|
|
Filing 16
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against The Reny Company, filed by Chelsa Brown.(rpc, )
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Chelsa Brown. (mem)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 7/6/2021. Rule 16 Management Conference set for 7/13/2021 at 09:30 AM in Ctrm 108 (Plano) before Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 5/26/2021. (mem)
|
|
Filing 12
Case assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and referred to Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate referral) (mem)
|
|
Filing 11
Case transferred in from District of Texas Northern; Case Number 3:21-cv-00945. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
|
|
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mem, )
|
|
Filing 10
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by The Reny Company. (Lambert, Arthur) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 5/25/2021.]
|
|
Filing 9
ANSWER to #3 Complaint filed by The Reny Company. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Lambert, Arthur) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 5/25/2021.]
|
|
Filing 8
Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by The Reny Company re: #7 Partial MOTION to Dismiss. (Lambert, Arthur) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 5/25/2021.]
|
|
Filing 7
Partial MOTION to Dismiss filed by The Reny Company. Attorney Arthur V Lambert added to party The Reny Company.(pty:dft) (Lambert, Arthur) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 5/25/2021.]
|
|
Filing 6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Chelsa Brown. (oyh) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 5/25/2021.]
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: This case will therefore be transferred to the Sherman Division of the Eastern District of Texas under 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f)(3), 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), and the undersigned's authority granted by Rule 2(a)(3) of the Court's Miscellaneous Order No. 6 on 5/24/2021 to allow any party to file an objection to Judge Cummings within 14 days after being served with a copy of this order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 5/3/2021) (mla) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 5/25/2021.]
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Mon May 3 14:30:31 CDT 2021 (crt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 5/25/2021.]
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Wed Apr 28 10:28:26 CDT 2021 (crt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 5/25/2021.]
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to The Reny Company. (ndt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 5/25/2021.]
|
|
Filing 3
COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against The Reny Company filed by Chelsa Brown. (Filing fee $402.00; Receipt number DS131001) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (ndt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 5/25/2021.]
|
|
Filing 2
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (ndt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 5/25/2021.]
|
|
Filing 1
New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 5/25/2021.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. The Reny Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Reny Company | |
| Represented By: | Brent Douglas Sedge |
| Represented By: | Arthur V Lambert |
| Represented By: | Arthur Vincent Lambert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chelsa Brown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
