Daniels v. Foxworth-Galbraith Lumber Co.
Jeffery Bernard Daniels |
Foxworth-Galbraith Lumber Co. |
4:2021cv00428 |
June 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Amos L Mazzant |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. The case is SET for a Rule 16 management conference on Wednesday, 9/1/2021, at 11:30 AM in Ctrm 208 (Sherman) before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III. Rule 26 Meeting Joint Report due by 8/18/2021. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 7/14/2021. (baf, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Foxworth-Galbraith Lumber Co. (Johnson, John) |
Filing 4 Defendant Foxworth-Galbraith Lumber Co.'s Original ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Foxworth-Galbraith Lumber Co..(Johnson, John) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeffery Bernard Daniels. Foxworth-Galbraith Lumber Co. served on 6/9/2021, answer due 6/30/2021. (Notzon, Robert) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Foxworth-Galbraith Lumber Co.. (baf, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Foxworth-Galbraith Lumber Co. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8442534.), filed by Jeffery Bernard Daniels. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons(es) Summons Requested)(Notzon, Robert) |
Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (baf, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Daniels v. Foxworth-Galbraith Lumber Co. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Foxworth-Galbraith Lumber Co. | |
Represented By: | John Hunter Johnson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jeffery Bernard Daniels | |
Represented By: | Robert Stephen Notzon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.