Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.
| Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC |
| Big Lots Stores, Inc. |
| 4:2021cv00552 |
| July 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Big Lots Stores, Inc.( McNabnay, Neil) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC. Big Lots Stores, Inc. served on 8/27/2021, answer due 9/17/2021. (Corcoran, Peter) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS REISSUED as to Big Lots Stores, Inc. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Big Lots Stores, Inc.. (baf, ) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equitable IP Corporation for Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC. (Corcoran, Peter) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC of Related Cases (Corcoran, Peter) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Corcoran, Peter) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Corcoran, Peter) |
| Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (baf, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Big Lots Stores, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8498172.), filed by Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1-US8712846, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2-US8396743, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3-8,712,846 v Big Lots 21-05-06, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4-8,396,743 v Big Lots 21-05-06, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Corcoran, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. Big Lots Stores, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC | |
| Represented By: | Peter Joseph Corcoran, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Big Lots Stores, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Neil J McNabnay |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
