AutoBrilliance, LLC v. General Motors Company et al
Plaintiff: AutoBrilliance, LLC
Defendant: General Motors Company and General Motors LLC
Case Number: 4:2021cv00654
Filed: August 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sean D Jordan
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 10/12/2021. (mcg)
October 12, 2021 Answer Due Deadline Updated for General Motors Company to 11/10/2021; General Motors LLC to 11/10/2021. (mcg)
October 7, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kelly B Tidwell on behalf of All Defendants (Tidwell, Kelly)
October 7, 2021 Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by General Motors Company, General Motors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Culbertson, Geoffrey)
October 7, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Geoffrey Patton Culbertson on behalf of All Defendants (Culbertson, Geoffrey)
October 6, 2021 NOTICE of Deficiency regarding Document #12 (Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint) submitted by General Motors Company, General Motors LLC. Application cannot be granted by clerk pursuant to Local Rule CV-12. (daj, )
October 5, 2021 Filing 12 ***DEFICIENT - APPLICATION CANNOT BE GRANTED BY CLERK*** Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re General Motors Company, General Motors LLC.( Word, Michael) Modified on 10/6/2021 (daj, ).
September 9, 2021 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for General Motors LLC to 10/11/2021; General Motors Company to 10/11/2021. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( rpc, )
September 8, 2021 Filing 11 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re General Motors Company, General Motors LLC.( Word, Michael)
September 8, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael J. Word on behalf of General Motors Company, General Motors LLC (Word, Michael)
August 30, 2021 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by AutoBrilliance, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Both Executed Summons as to Corrected Exhibit)(Delaney, Patrick)
August 27, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE by AutoBrilliance, LLC re #1 Complaint, Notice of Correction to Exhibit A-1 to the Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1)(Delaney, Patrick)
August 20, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by AutoBrilliance, LLC. General Motors Company served on 8/20/2021, answer due 9/10/2021; General Motors LLC served on 8/20/2021, answer due 9/10/2021. (Attachments: #1 Executed Summons)(Devlin, Timothy)
August 20, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to General Motors LLC. (mcg)
August 20, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to General Motors Company. (mcg)
August 19, 2021 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mcg)
August 19, 2021 Case Assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (mcg)
August 19, 2021 Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Devlin, Timothy)
August 19, 2021 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by AutoBrilliance, LLC (Devlin, Timothy)
August 19, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against General Motors Company, General Motors LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8545660.), filed by AutoBrilliance, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit A-1, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit B-1)(Devlin, Timothy) (Attachment 1 replaced with flattened image on 8/20/2021) (mcg).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AutoBrilliance, LLC v. General Motors Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AutoBrilliance, LLC
Represented By: Timothy Devlin
Represented By: Patrick R Delaney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General Motors Company
Represented By: Michael J. Word
Represented By: Geoffrey Patton Culbertson
Represented By: Kelly B Tidwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General Motors LLC
Represented By: Michael J. Word
Represented By: Geoffrey Patton Culbertson
Represented By: Kelly B Tidwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?