Chang v. Arvest Central Mortgage Company
Plaintiff: Chung Chang
Defendant: Arvest Central Mortgage Company
Case Number: 4:2021cv00713
Filed: September 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Amos L Mazzant
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/10/2021. (mcg)
November 5, 2021 Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Arvest Central Mortgage Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Curran, Charles)
October 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER AND ADVISORY. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/18/2021. (mcg)
October 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/19/2021. Rule 16 Management Conference set for 12/6/2021 at 02:00 PM in Ctrm 208 (Sherman) before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/15/2021. (rpc, )
September 13, 2021 Filing 4 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT*** ANSWER to #3 Petition by Arvest Central Mortgage Company.(mcg)
September 13, 2021 Filing 3 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT*** PETITION against Arvest Central Mortgage Company, filed by Chung Chang.(mcg)
September 13, 2021 Case Assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (mcg)
September 13, 2021 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mcg)
September 13, 2021 Filing 2 Additional Attachments to Main Document:. (Curran, Charles)
September 13, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Arvest Central Mortgage Company from 366th District Court, case number 366-0489-2021. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8579134), filed by Arvest Central Mortgage Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D1, #5 Exhibit D2, #6 Exhibit D3, #7 Exhibit D4, #8 Exhibit D5, #9 Exhibit E, #10 Exhibit F, #11 Exhibit G, #12 Exhibit G1, #13 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Curran, Charles)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chang v. Arvest Central Mortgage Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chung Chang
Represented By: Jason A LeBoeuf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arvest Central Mortgage Company
Represented By: Charles Royal Curran
Represented By: James Garth Fennegan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?