Williams v. Walmart, Inc.
Cathy Williams |
Walmart, Inc. |
4:2021cv00766 |
October 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Amos L Mazzant |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE by Cathy Williams Of First Set of Discovery Request to Defendant (Matthews, Stewart) |
Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Johnson, David) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by Cathy Williams Service of Initial Disclosures (Matthews, Stewart) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #6 Motion to Withdraw and Substitute Counsel. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/10/2021. (mem) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by David Aaron Johnson on behalf of Walmart, Inc. (Johnson, David) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Substitute Attorney , MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Walmart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Moses, Steven) |
Filing 5 ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/19/2021. Rule 16 Management Conference set for 12/6/2021 03:30 PM in Ctrm 208 (Sherman) before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/15/2021. (mem) |
Filing 4 ORDER AND ADVISORY re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Walmart, Inc. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/7/2021. (baf, ) |
Filing 3 ***ANSWER FILED IN STATE COURT*** ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Walmart, Inc..(mem) |
Filing 2 ***COMPLAINT FILED IN STATE COURT*** COMPLAINT against Walmart, Inc., filed by Cathy Williams.(mem) |
Case assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (mem) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mem, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Walmart, Inc. from 62nd Judicial District Court of Hopkins County, case number CV44809. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8608279), filed by Walmart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(Merritt, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Williams v. Walmart, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cathy Williams | |
Represented By: | Stewart Donavan Matthews |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Walmart, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Edward Lawrence Merritt |
Represented By: | David Aaron Johnson |
Represented By: | Steven Jerome Moses |
Represented By: | Jessica Merritt LaRue |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.