American Patents LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc.
| American Patents LLC |
| Motorola Solutions, Inc. |
| 4:2021cv00856 |
| October 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (baf, ) |
Filing 14
ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that all claims asserted by American against Motorola Solutions in this action are hereby dismissed with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that American and Motorola Solutions shall bear their own costs, expenses and legal fees in this case. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 12/14/2021. (baf, )
|
| Filing 13 Agreed MOTION to Dismiss by American Patents LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, Zachariah) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Motorola Solutions, Inc. to 12/24/2021. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(mem) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re American Patents LLC.(Harrington, Zachariah) (Main Document 12 replaced with flattened pdf on 11/17/2021) (mem). |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by American Patents LLC. Motorola Solutions, Inc. served on 11/3/2021, answer due 11/24/2021. (Harrington, Zachariah) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by American Patents LLC of Related Cases (Harrington, Zachariah) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by American Patents LLC (Harrington, Zachariah) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued as to Motorola Solutions, Inc. (mem) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher Ryan Pinckney on behalf of American Patents LLC (Pinckney, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Larry Dean Thompson, Jr on behalf of American Patents LLC (Thompson, Larry) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew J Antonelli on behalf of American Patents LLC (Antonelli, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Catherine Susan Bartles on behalf of American Patents LLC (Bartles, Catherine) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stafford Grigsby Helm Davis on behalf of American Patents LLC (Davis, Stafford) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Harrington, Zachariah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Motorola Solutions, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8640171.), filed by American Patents LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Harrington, Zachariah) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mem, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (mem) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
