Opulent Treasures, Inc. v. Lamps Plus, Inc. et al
Opulent Treasures, Inc. |
Lamps Plus, Inc., Lamps Plus-Centennial, Inc., Lamps Plus Holdings, Inc., Universal Distributing, LLC, Pacific Coast Lighting, Inc. and Does 1 - 10 |
4:2021cv00878 |
November 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Amos L Mazzant |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 44 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Lamps Plus Holdings, Inc. to 1/7/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( baf, ) |
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Lamps Plus-Centennial, Inc. to 1/7/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( baf, ) |
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Lamps Plus, Inc. to 1/7/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( baf, ) |
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Pacific Coast Lighting, Inc. to 1/7/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( baf, ) |
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Universal Distributing, LLC to 1/7/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( baf, ) |
Filing 14 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Universal Distributing, LLC.( Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 13 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Pacific Coast Lighting, Inc..( Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 12 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Lamps Plus-Centennial, Inc..( Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 11 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Lamps Plus, Inc..( Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 10 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Lamps Plus Holdings, Inc..( Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Opulent Treasures, Inc.. Lamps Plus Holdings, Inc. served on 11/17/2021, answer due 12/8/2021; Lamps Plus, Inc. served on 11/17/2021, answer due 12/8/2021; Lamps Plus-Centennial, Inc. served on 11/17/2021, answer due 12/8/2021; Pacific Coast Lighting, Inc. served on 11/17/2021, answer due 12/8/2021; Universal Distributing, LLC served on 11/17/2021, answer due 12/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es) Proof of Service, #2 Summons(es) Proof of Service, #3 Summons(es) Proof of Service, #4 Summons(es) Proof of Service)(Brozynski, Katarzyna) |
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Opulent Treasures, Inc. (Brozynski, Katarzyna) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued as to Pacific Coast Lighting, Inc.. (baf, ) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Universal Distributing, LLC. (baf, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Lamps Plus Holdings, Inc.. (baf, ) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Lamps Plus-Centennial, Inc.. (baf, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Lamps Plus, Inc.. (baf, ) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Dalton, Bartholomew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8656170.), filed by Opulent Treasures, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brozynski, Katarzyna) |
Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (baf, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.