Rowland v. State Farm Lloyds
| Robert Rowland |
| State Farm Lloyds |
| 4:2021cv00879 |
| November 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Interdistrict transfer to the Northern District of Texas. (daj, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Change Venue. It is therefore ORDERED that the above captioned action shall be transferred to the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/15/2021. (daj, )
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION to Change Venue by Robert Rowland. (Bryan, Jonathan) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/12/2021: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (baf, ). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER AND ADVISORY. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/8/2021. (daj, )
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew Clay Sapp on behalf of State Farm Lloyds (Sapp, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Samuel Theodore Scott, Jr on behalf of State Farm Lloyds (Scott, Samuel) |
| Filing 4 ***ORIGINAL ANSWER FILED IN STATE COURT*** ANSWER to #3 Complaint by State Farm Lloyds.(daj, ) |
| Filing 3 ***ORIGINAL PETITION FILED IN STATE COURT*** COMPLAINT against State Farm Lloyds, filed by Robert Rowland.(daj, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (daj, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (daj, ) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by State Farm Lloyds (Egeland, Susan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by State Farm Lloyds from 429th Collin County, case number 429-05176-2021. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8657411), filed by State Farm Lloyds. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H)(Egeland, Susan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rowland v. State Farm Lloyds | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Rowland | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Brad Bryan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State Farm Lloyds | |
| Represented By: | Susan Elizabeth Egeland |
| Represented By: | Matthew Clay Sapp |
| Represented By: | Samuel Theodore Scott, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
