Ewing v. Fannin County Detention Center
| Quentin Lee Ewing |
| Fannin County Detention Center |
| 4:2021cv00910 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Christine A Nowak |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
(Second) DEFICIENCY ORDER. ORDERED that Plaintiff has thirty days from the date of this Order to complete the civil rights form clearly and legibly, and to submit it to the Court, not later than Wednesday, February 9, 2022, at 5:00 p.m. ORDERED that Plaintiff has thirty days from the date of this Order to either pay the $402.00 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, together with an in forma pauperis data sheet, not later than Wednesday, February 9, 2022, at 5:00 p.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 1/10/2022. (daj, )
|
|
Filing 3
DEFICIENCY ORDER. It is ORDERED the Clerk of Court forward a standard 1983 prisoner civil rights form and the standard form for requesting in forma pauperis status to Plaintiff along with a copy of this Order. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff has thirty days from the receipt of this Order to complete the civil rights form clearly and legibly, and to submit it to the Court. It is finally ORDERED that Plaintiff has thirty days from the receipt of this Order to either pay the $402.00 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, together with an in forma pauperis data sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 12/10/2021. (rpc, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and referred to Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate referral) (daj, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fannin County Detention Center, filed by Quentin Lee Ewing. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(daj, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. **Consent form mailed to plf. (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ewing v. Fannin County Detention Center | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Quentin Lee Ewing | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Fannin County Detention Center | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
