Thames v. Director, TDCJ-CID
David S. Thames |
Director, TDCJ-CID |
4:2021cv00976 |
December 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Sean D Jordan |
Christine A Nowak |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE TO THE COURT (re filing fee and amended documents) by David S. Thames (mem) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/7/2022: #1 Envelope(s)) (mem, ). |
Filing 8 ORDER- It is ORDERED Petitioner has fourteen days to respond as to the timeliness ofhis petition. He is placed on notice that his 2254 petition may be dismissed if he fails to timelycomply with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 02/04/2022. (klc, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER finding as moot #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 1/31/2022. (mem) |
Filing fee received: $ 5, receipt number 6-59489 (gsg) |
Filing 6 ORDER that the Clerk of Court send a standard application to proceed informa pauperis form to Petitioner along with this Order. It is further ORDERED Petitioner has thirty days from the receipt of this Order to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or to complete the application to proceed in forma pauperis form fully and legibly, and to submit it to the Court. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of the lawsuit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 01/14/2022. (las, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by David S. Thames (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(mem) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David S. Thames. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Data Sheet, #2 Envelope(s))(mem) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan and referred to Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate referral) (mem) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by David S. Thames. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Envelope(s))(mem) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mem) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Thames v. Director, TDCJ-CID | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: David S. Thames | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.