King et al v. Texas A&M Engineering Extension Service
| Kenneth King and Ben Kennedy |
| Texas A&M Engineering Extension Service |
| 4:2021cv01005 |
| December 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ben Kennedy, Kenneth King. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Huff, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 12
Unopposed MOTION to Stay Scheduling Conference and Discovery by Texas A&M Engineering Extension Service. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Graydon, Scot)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Response due by 2/25/2022. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/23/2022. (mem)
|
|
Filing 10
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss by Ben Kennedy, Kenneth King. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Huff, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/23/2022. Rule 16 Management Conference set for 4/7/2022 at 10:00 AM in Ctrm 208 (Sherman) before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/16/2022. (mem)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Response due by 2/17/2022. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/9/2022. (mem)
|
|
Filing 7
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss by Ben Kennedy, Kenneth King. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Huff, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss by Texas A&M Engineering Extension Service. (Graydon, Scot) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/24/2022: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (mem, ).
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kenneth King, Ben Kennedy. (Huff, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kenneth King, Ben Kennedy. Texas A&M Engineering Extension Service served on 1/6/2022, answer due 1/31/2022. (Huff, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kenneth King, Ben Kennedy. Texas A&M Engineering Extension Service served on 1/10/2022, answer due 1/31/2022. (Huff, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS Issued as to Texas A&M Engineering Extension Service. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es), #2 Summons(es))(mem)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Texas A&M Engineering Extension Service ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8726232.), filed by Kenneth King, Ben Kennedy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Huff, Ronald) (Attachment 1 replaced with flattened pdf on 12/29/2021) (mem).
|
|
Case assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (mem)
|
|
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mem)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
