Conley v. BMI et al
| Sterling Conley |
| BMI, Rounders Records, Welk Music, Sugar Hill, Concord Music Group, Wynwood Music Co., Vanguard Records Co., Okeh Records, Windswept Pacific, Sony Record, Amazon Records, Country Joe and the Fish, John Hammond, Chris Smither, Tom Paxton, Dave Van Ron K, Doc and Merie Watson, Anne Reed, John Fahey, Taj Mahal Bruce, Bob Dylan, Jerry Garcia, John McCutheon, Phillip Ratcliffe, Bill Morrisey Estate, Verizon Phone Co., Nokia Phone Co., Virgin Mobile Phone Co., AT&T Phone Co., Com Cast Phone Co., Boost Mobile Phone Co., South Bell Phone Co., Cingular Edge Phone Co., Metro PCS Phone Co., Nextel Phone Co., South Central Bell Phone Co., Horizon Record Group, American League Music Co., T-Mobile Phone Co., Stefan Grossman67, Mississippi John Hurt Music, INC. and GM Legal Department |
| 4:2022cv00001 |
| January 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Christine A Nowak |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 39 MOTION to Request a Chance of Court and Magistrate by Sterling Conley. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s), #2 Envelope)(jmb) |
| Filing 38 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Sterling Conley as to #37 Order. (rpc, ) |
Filing 37
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING #35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff Sterling Conley's claims against Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All relief not previously granted is DENIED.The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 06/13/2023. (jmb)
|
| Filing 36 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Sterling Conley as to #35 Report and Recommendations. (las, ) |
| Filing 35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 05/18/2023. (jmb) |
|
Filing 34
ORDER denying #28 Motion for Recusal. It is ORDERED that pro se Plaintiff Sterling Conley's Motion for Recusal (Dkt. #28 ) is hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 03/23/2023. (jmb, )
|
|
Filing 33
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Concord Music Group, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively Motion for More Definite Statement (Dkt. #23 ) is DENIED without prejudice to refiling. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 3/8/2023. (rpc, )
|
| Filing 32 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Sterling Conley as to #30 Report and Recommendation. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 31 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Sterling Conley as to #29 Order. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The Court recommends Defendant Concord Music Group, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively Motion for More Definite Statement [Dkt. #23 ] be DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING. Plaintiff Sterling Conley is directed to serve Defendant Concord Music Group, Inc. no later than Monday, March 6, 2023 [Dkt. #29 ]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 2/7/2023. (rpc, ) |
|
Filing 29
ORDER denying #20 Motion Requesting the Courtto Serve Summons. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff has until Monday, March 6, 2023, to perfect service.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 02/01/2023. (klc, )
|
| Filing 28 MOTION for Recusal by Sterling Conley. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 27 RESPONSE to Motion re #23 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Sterling Conley. (baf, ) |
| Filing 26 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Sterling Conley as to #25 Order, #24 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. (baf, ) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE re #23 MOTION to Dismiss. Pro se Plaintiff Sterling Conley shall file a response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #23 ], if at all, no later than Wednesday, June 22, 2022, at 5:00 p.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 6/6/2022. (rpc, )
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER granting #22 Motion to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Defendants Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, Motion for More Definite Statement [Dkt. #23 ] is deemed properly filed before the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 6/6/2022. (rpc, )
|
| Filing 23 MOTION to Dismiss by Concord Music Group, Rounders Records, Sugar Hill. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons and transmittal, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Rollins, Derek) |
| Filing 22 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #9 Summons Issued, #11 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint, #12 Summons Issued by Concord Music Group, Rounders Records, Sugar Hill. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Rollins, Derek) |
| Filing 21 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Order #7 sent to Sterling Conley returned marked "RETURN TO SENDER - UNCLAIMED - UNABLE TO FORWARD" (rpc, ) |
| Filing 20 MOTION Requesting Court to Serve Summonses by Sterling Conley. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 19 SUMMONS Issued as to GM Legal Department. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 18 SUMMONS Issued as to Mississippi John Hurt Music, INC. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Issued as to Amazon Records. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS Issued as to Sony Record. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS Issued as to Windswept Pacific. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Issued as to Vanguard Records Co. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Issued as to Wynwood Music Co. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Issued as to Concord Music Group. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Issued as to Sugar Hill. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Issued as to Welk Music. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Issued as to Rounders Records. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued as to BMI. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF IMPENDING DISMISSAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 3/10/2022. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Sterling Conley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(rpc, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/16/2022: #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2) (rpc, ). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff Sterling Conley's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Dkt. #2 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 1/12/2022. (rpc, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER FOR AMENDED COMPLAINT. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff Sterling Conley shall file an amended complaint, no later than Friday, February 4, 2022, at 5:00 p.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 1/7/2022. (rpc, )
|
| Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number TXE600059286 (rpc, ) |
| Filing 3 Case Assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and referred to Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate referral) (rpc, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sterling Conley. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Sterling Conley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(rpc, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. *** Form mailed to Plaintiff. (rpc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
