Katanjian v. Ford Motor Company
| Koko Katanjian |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 4:2022cv00038 |
| January 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Kimberly C Priest Johnson |
| Sean D Jordan |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE Re: #15 Stipulation of Dismissal: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this civil case is dismissed with prejudice. The clerk will close and terminate this matter. (ldm) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION of Dismissal (JOINT) by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order of Dismissal)(Flores, Israel) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/3/2022) (baf, ). |
Filing 14
ORDER. On June 27, 2022, Plaintiff Koko Katanjian ("Plaintiff") filed a Notice of Settlement (Dkt. 13), wherein Plaintiff represents the parties have settled all claims between them. See Dkt. 13. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff and Defendant Ford Motor Company shall submit to the Court all papers necessary for the resolution of the claims between them no later than August 26, 2022. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Rule 16 management conference set for June 29, 2022, is hereby CANCELED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 6/27/2022. (baf, )
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement by Koko Katanjian (Kimmel, Craig) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER. Rule 16 Management Conference RESET for 6/29/2022 at 10:00 AM in Ctrm 108 (Plano) before Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 5/10/2022. (rpc, )
|
|
Filing 11
REFERRAL ORDER. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 and Local Rule CV-72, the undersigned hereby REFERS this case to U. S. Magistrate Judge Kimberly Priest Johnson for all pretrial proceedings. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 5/9/2022. (rpc, )
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Koko Katanjian (Kimmel, Craig) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Ford Motor Company (Flores, Israel) |
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(Kimmel, Craig) |
| Filing 7 First Amended ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Statement of Affirmative Defenses, and Reliance on Jury Demand by Ford Motor Company.(Flores, Israel) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/6/2022. Rule 16 Management Conference set for 6/1/2022 at 11:00 AM in Ctrm 105 (Plano) before District Judge Sean D. Jordan. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 3/31/2022. (mcg)
|
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Ford Motor Company (Flores, Israel) |
| Filing 4 ORIGINAL ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Statement of Affirmative Defenses by Ford Motor Company.(Flores, Israel) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Summons served on Ford Motor Company on March 8, 2022, filed by Koko Katanjian. (Kimmel, Craig) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Ford Motor Company. (baf, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ford Motor Company, filed by Koko Katanjian. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B-1, #3 Exhibit B-2, #4 Exhibit B-3, #5 Exhibit B-4, #6 Exhibit B-5, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(ch, ) (Filing Fee $402.00 Paid 0540-8751905) Modified on 1/19/2022 (ch, ). |
| Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (baf, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Katanjian v. Ford Motor Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Koko Katanjian | |
| Represented By: | Craig Thor Kimmel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
| Represented By: | Johnny Wayne Chambless, II |
| Represented By: | Israel Flores, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
