Cappiello v. Director, TDCJ-CID
| Director, TDCJ-CID |
| Chad Alan Cappiello |
| 4:2022cv00078 |
| February 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Christine A Nowak |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER. It is ORDERED that Petitioner's two cases, civil action numbers 4:19-cv-264 and 4:22-cv-78 are CONSOLIDATED. Civil action number 4:19-cv-264 shall serve as the lead case, and the Clerk's Office should docket future activity only in the lead case with the exception of closing documents. Both Petitioner and Respondent should refer to both cause numbers when filing documents in the consolidated cases. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 2/24/2022. (mcg)
|
| This civil action is CONSOLIDATED with cause 4:19-cv-264 designated as the Lead Case. All future pleadings are to be filed in the Lead Case. (mcg) |
| Filing 3 Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Referral) (baf, ) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER. Pro se Petitioner Chad Alan Cappiello filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Having examined the petition submitted and filed as 4:19cv264, it appears that Petitioner is challenging two separate causes. It is accordingly ORDERED that Petitioner's case be SEVERED into one additional new case, resulting in a total of two habeas cases challenging the two convictions at the state level. The present case, Cause Number 4:19cv264, shall serve as the lead case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 2/11/2022. (baf, )
|
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
| Pursuant to ORDER 47 entered in lead case 4:19cv264: LEAD CASE: 4:19CV264. CONSOLIDATED MEMBER CASE: 4:22CV78. |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Chad Alan Cappiello. (Attachments: #1 ATTACHMENT)(baf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cappiello v. Director, TDCJ-CID | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Chad Alan Cappiello | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Director, TDCJ-CID | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
