Dickey v. Tidwell et al
| James Dickey |
| Hon. Judge Wesley Tidwell, Hon. Judge Bill Harris, Gary D Young and Benjamin I Kaminar |
| 4:2022cv00107 |
| February 17, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Kimberly C Priest Johnson |
| Sean D Jordan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Sean D. Jordan and REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson. (Attachments: #1 MAGISTRATE REFERRAL) (baf, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bill Harris, Benjamin I Kaminar, Wesley Tidwell, Gary D Young, filed by James Dickey (FILING FEE: NOT PAID). (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(baf, ) |
| Pursuant to General Order 14-10, this case has been randomly assigned to a Magistrate Judge. With the written consent of all parties, a Magistrate Judge may conduct all proceedings in a case, including all pretrial and trial proceedings, entry of judgment and post trial motions. 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c). The form #Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
