Franklin v. Rosemergy
Courtney Franklin |
James Paul Rosemergy |
4:2022cv00221 |
March 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Kimberly C Priest Johnson |
Amos L Mazzant |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's construed motion for an extension of time (Dkt. #8) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff has fourteen days from the receipt of this Order to pay the initial partial filing fee of $2.50. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 6/14/2022. (baf, ) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE to #6 Order filed by Courtney Franklin. (Attachments: #1 Data Sheet, #2 Envelope(s))(rpc, ) |
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Courtney Franklin as to #6 Order. (rpc, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The granting of the motion does not relieve Plaintiff of the responsibility of paying the $350.00 filing fee or any partial fees connected therewith, unless and until the Court directs otherwise, regardless of the disposition of the case. An initial partial filing fee of $2.50 shall be paid to the Clerk within thirty days from the receipt of this Order. Service of process shall be withheld pending screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 5/6/2022. (rpc, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Lamar County Documents by Courtney Franklin (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(rpc, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Courtney Franklin. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Balance History Report, #2 Envelope(s))(rpc, ) |
Filing 2 Case Assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and referred to Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate referral) (rpc, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Courtney Franklin. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(rpc, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. *** Consent form mailed to Plaintiff. (rpc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Franklin v. Rosemergy | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Courtney Franklin | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: James Paul Rosemergy | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.