Taylor v. Delta County et al
| 4:2022cv00250 |
| May 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sherman Office |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Opposed Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. # 32 ) is hereby DENIED without prejudice. After additional discovery, Plaintiffs may refile this motion. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 03/27/2024. (XL)
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 6 MOTION to Dismiss FILED SUBJECT TO AND WITHOUT WAIVING THEIR MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE WITHIN DISTRICT filed by Zach Williamson, Sheriff Charla Singleton, County Attorney Jay Garrett, Former Sheriff Ricky Smith, Delta County, Delta County Sheriff's Department, County Judge Jason Murray. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff Patrick Andre Taylor II's civil rights claims against the Delta County Sheriff's Department are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 5/31/2022. (daj, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Taylor v. Delta County et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
