Oppenheimer v. Nguyen et al
Plaintiff: David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant: Anthony A Nguyen, LOP, Inc. and Anthony A Nguyen doing business as Money Hustler Blog
Case Number: 4:2022cv00358
Filed: April 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Amos L Mazzant
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. Rule 26 Meeting Joint Report due by 7/28/2022. The case is set for a Rule 16 management conference on Friday, 8/12/2022, at 10:30 AM in Ctrm 208 (Sherman) before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 6/23/2022. (baf, )
June 15, 2022 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE by David Gordon Oppenheimer. Anthony A Nguyen served on 5/5/2022, answer due 5/26/2022. (LeJune, Dana)
June 15, 2022 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE by David Gordon Oppenheimer. LOP, Inc. served on 5/5/2022, answer due 5/26/2022. (LeJune, Dana)
May 18, 2022 Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Anthony A Nguyen. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(baf, )
April 29, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to LOP, Inc.. (baf, )
April 29, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Anthony A Nguyen. (baf, )
April 28, 2022 Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (baf, )
April 28, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, )
April 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8895512.), filed by David Gordon Oppenheimer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - The Work, #2 Exhibit 2 - Registration, #3 Exhibit 3 - Infringement, #4 Exhibit 4 - C&D Letter, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover)(LeJune, Dana)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oppenheimer v. Nguyen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Gordon Oppenheimer
Represented By: Dana A LeJune
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony A Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LOP, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony A Nguyen doing business as Money Hustler Blog
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?