N.H. et al v. Castilleja et al
| N. H. and Nadine Depp |
| Natalie Castilleja, Matthew Marick and Denton County |
| 4:2022cv00436 |
| May 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Issued as to Natalie Castilleja. (mmc)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Issued as to Matthew Marick. (mmc)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS Issued as to Denton County. (mmc)
|
|
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mem)
|
|
Case assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (mem)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-8936908.), filed by N. H., Nadine Depp.(Fuller, Seth) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/6/2022: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (mem, ).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
