Corrente et al v. The Charles Schwab Corporation
Plaintiff: Jonathan Corrente, Charles Shaw and Leo Williams
Defendant: The Charles Schwab Corporation
Case Number: 4:2022cv00470
Filed: June 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Amos L Mazzant
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 25 Clayton Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sidney Calvin Capshaw, III on behalf of Jonathan Corrente, Charles Shaw, Leo Williams (Capshaw, Sidney)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Elizabeth L DeRieux on behalf of Jonathan Corrente, Charles Shaw, Leo Williams (DeRieux, Elizabeth)
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Defendant The Charles Schwab Corporation is granted an extension up to and through August 29, 2022, to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the complaint. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 6/29/2022. (daj, )
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Harry Lee Gillam, Jr on behalf of The Charles Schwab Corporation (Gillam, Harry)
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Answer Due Deadline Updated for The Charles Schwab Corporation to 8/29/2022. (daj, )
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by The Charles Schwab Corporation (Smith, Melissa)
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by The Charles Schwab Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa)
June 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Leo Williams, Charles Shaw, Jonathan Corrente. The Charles Schwab Corporation served on 6/9/2022, answer due 6/30/2022. (Dunne, Brian)
June 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to The Charles Schwab Corporation. (daj, )
June 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Edward Maxwell Grauman on behalf of Jonathan Corrente, Charles Shaw, Leo Williams (Grauman, Edward)
June 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrew Chan Wolinsky on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Wolinsky, Andrew)
June 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Yavar Bathaee on behalf of Jonathan Corrente, Charles Shaw, Leo Williams (Bathaee, Yavar)
June 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Charles Schwab Corporation ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-8955321.), filed by Leo Williams, Charles Shaw, Jonathan Corrente. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dunne, Brian)
June 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (kls, )
June 2, 2022 Opinion or Order In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (kls, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Corrente et al v. The Charles Schwab Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Corrente
Represented By: Yavar Bathaee
Represented By: Andrew Chan Wolinsky
Represented By: Edward Maxwell Grauman
Represented By: Brian James Dunne
Represented By: Elizabeth L DeRieux
Represented By: Sidney Calvin Capshaw, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Shaw
Represented By: Yavar Bathaee
Represented By: Andrew Chan Wolinsky
Represented By: Edward Maxwell Grauman
Represented By: Brian James Dunne
Represented By: Elizabeth L DeRieux
Represented By: Sidney Calvin Capshaw, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leo Williams
Represented By: Yavar Bathaee
Represented By: Andrew Chan Wolinsky
Represented By: Edward Maxwell Grauman
Represented By: Brian James Dunne
Represented By: Elizabeth L DeRieux
Represented By: Sidney Calvin Capshaw, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Charles Schwab Corporation
Represented By: Harry Lee Gillam, Jr
Represented By: Melissa Richards Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?