Paraham v. 6th District Court of Lamar County, TX et al
Plaintiff: Marco Paraham
Defendant: 6th District Court of Lamar County, TX and Gary Young
Case Number: 4:2022cv00524
Filed: June 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Kimberly C Priest Johnson
Referring Judge: Amos L Mazzant
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2023 Filing 26 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Marco Paraham as to #25 Order. (mcg)
January 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER. It is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #22 ) is WITHDRAWN. It is further ORDERED that Petitioner has thirty days from the receipt of this Order to either pay the initial partial filing fee of $31.67 or submit a certified up-to-date in forma pauperis data sheet showing that he has insufficient assets or means by which to pay the initial partial filing fee. It is finally ORDERED that the Clerk shall not accept any other documents in this case, except for a motion for an extension of time, until Petitioner complies with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 1/19/2023. (mcg)
January 17, 2023 Filing 24 NOTICE of Change of Address by Marco Paraham (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(baf, )
December 28, 2022 Filing 23 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Marco Paraham as to #22 Report and Recommendation. (mcg)
December 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ***WITHDRAWN PER ORDER #25 ***REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is recommended that the case be dismissed without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P.41(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 12/16/2022. (mcg) Modified on 1/20/2023 (mcg, ).
November 14, 2022 Filing 21 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Marco Paraham as to #20 Order. (mcg)
November 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER. It is accordingly ORDERED that Plaintiff has fourteen days from the receipt of this Order to provide the Clerk of Court with his current physical mailing address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 11/1/2022. (baf, )
October 11, 2022 Filing 19 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Marco Paraham as to #18 Order. (mcg)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff has fourteen days from the receipt of this Order to either pay the initial partial filing fee of $31.67 or submit a certified up-to-date in forma pauperis data sheet reporting trust fund activities for the last six months. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 10/3/2022. (mcg)
August 31, 2022 Filing 17 RESPONSE to #15 Order for Initial Partial Filing Fee, filed by Marco Paraham. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(mcg)
August 31, 2022 Filing 16 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Marco Paraham as to #15 Order for Initial Partial Filing Fee. (mcg)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE ORDER. Plaintiff's motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. # #11 , #13 ) are GRANTED. An initial partial filing fee of $31.67 shall be paid to the Clerk within thirty days from the receipt of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 8/23/2022. (mcg)
August 19, 2022 Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Marco Paraham as to #12 Order. (mcg)
August 19, 2022 Filing 13 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marco Paraham. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Data Sheet, #3 Envelope(s))(mcg)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER. It is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court return to Plaintiff his application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. #11 ). It is also ORDERED that the Clerk of Court forward a standardized application to proceed in forma pauperis form for prisoners to Plaintiff. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff has thirty days to submit a full and completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 8/9/2022. (mcg)
August 4, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marco Paraham. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(mcg, )
July 25, 2022 Filing 10 RESPONSE to #7 Order, filed by Marco Paraham. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(mcg)
July 25, 2022 Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Marco Paraham as to #7 Order. (mcg)
July 18, 2022 Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Marco Paraham as to #3 Order. (rpc, )
July 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER. It is ORDERED Plaintiff has fourteen days from the receipt of this Order to either pay the $402.00 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 7/15/2022. (mcg)
July 13, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Inmate Transaction History by Marco Paraham (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(baf, )
July 13, 2022 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against 6th District Court of Lamar County, TX and Gary Young, filed by Marco Paraham. (Attachments: #1 Supplement 1, #2 Supplement 2, #3 Envelope(s))(baf, )
June 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER. It is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court return to Plaintiff his 1983 form (Dkt. #1 ) for his signature. It is further ORDERED Plaintiff has thirty days to sign the 1983 form on the top of page 5 and submit it to the Court. It is also ORDERED Plaintiff has fourteen days from the receipt of this Order to either pay the $402.00 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis along with a certified data sheet reporting his trust fund activities for the last six months. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 6/28/2022. (mcg)
June 23, 2022 Filing 2 Case Assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and referral Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Referral) (mcg)
June 23, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 6th District Court of Lamar County, TX, Gary Young, filed by Marco Paraham. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Envelope(s))(mcg, )
June 23, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. **Consent form mailed to Plaintiff** (mcg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paraham v. 6th District Court of Lamar County, TX et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marco Paraham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 6th District Court of Lamar County, TX
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?