Valles v. ACT, Inc.
Plaintiff: Pierson Valles
Defendant: ACT, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2022cv00568
Filed: July 7, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Amos L Mazzant
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Pierson Valles (Whitburn, Mark)
July 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court finds a temporary restraining order is not warranted in this case because Valles has not satisfied the appropriate standard. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. #2 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 7/15/2022. (baf, )
July 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III: Motion Hearing held on 7/15/2022 at 8:00 a.m. re #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Pierson Valles. Mark Whitburn appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. Caroline Mew and Miranda Deveux appeared on behalf of the Defendant. Court takes matter under advisement. Court will enter order. (Court Reporter Shawn McRoberts.) (kkc, )
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Caroline Mew on behalf of ACT, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9017226. (Mew, Caroline)
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #6 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File [Defendant ACT,'s Unopposed Motion to File Overlength Brief]. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 7/13/2022. (ch, )
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear for Virtual Hearing. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 07/13/2022. (klc, )
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order [Defendant ACT's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction] filed by ACT, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Declaration-Aldeman, #3 Declaration-Featherston, #4 Declaration-Murphy)(Devereux, Miranda)
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File [Defendant ACT,'s Unopposed Motion to File Overlength Brief] by ACT, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Devereux, Miranda)
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Emergency MOTION for Leave to Appear FOR VIRTUAL HEARING --Emergency Motion by Defendant ACT for Virtual Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction-- by ACT, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Devereux, Miranda)
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTICE of RESETTING of time of hearing on #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order: Due to the Court's docket, the Motion Hearing is RESET for Friday 7/15/2022 8:00 AM in Ctrm 208 (Sherman) before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III. (tls)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order : Motion Hearing set for 7/15/2022 at 10:00 AM in Ctrm 208 (Sherman) before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 7/12/2022. (kls, )
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Miranda Nhu Devereux on behalf of ACT, Inc. (Devereux, Miranda)
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Pierson Valles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M)(Whitburn, Mark) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/7/2022: #14 Text of Proposed Order) (baf, ).
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ACT, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9007582.), filed by Pierson Valles. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Whitburn, Mark)
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (baf, )
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Valles v. ACT, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pierson Valles
Represented By: Mark S Whitburn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ACT, Inc.
Represented By: Caroline Mew
Represented By: Miranda Nhu Devereux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?