Aspiration Innovation, Inc. v. BMW of North America, LLC
Aspiration Innovation, Inc. |
BMW of North America, LLC |
4:2022cv00574 |
July 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Sean D Jordan |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Aspiration Innovation, Inc. to 9/18/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(mcg) |
Filing 7 Plaintiff's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer Complaint re Aspiration Innovation, Inc..( Anderson, Kirk) (Main Document 7 replaced on 8/19/2022 with flattened image) (mcg). |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aspiration Innovation, Inc.. BMW of North America, LLC served on 7/29/2022, answer due 8/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es))(Anderson, Kirk) |
Filing 5 ***FILING ERROR - ATTORNEY TO REFILE - PLEASE IGNORE*** AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on BMW of North America, LLC on 7/29/2022, filed by Aspiration Innovation, Inc.. (Anderson, Kirk) Modified on 8/8/2022 (mcg, ). |
NOTICE of Deficiency regarding #5 Affidavit of Service for Summons: INCORRECT DOCKET EVENT. Correction should be made by ONE BUSINESS DAY. (mcg) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to BMW of North America, LLC. (mmc) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Aspiration Innovation, Inc. (Anderson, Kirk) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Anderson, Kirk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against BMW of North America, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9010354.), filed by Aspiration Innovation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Anderson, Kirk) |
Case Assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (mcg) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mcg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Aspiration Innovation, Inc. v. BMW of North America, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Aspiration Innovation, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Kirk Anderson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: BMW of North America, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.