Aspiration Innovation, Inc. v. BMW of North America, LLC
Plaintiff: Aspiration Innovation, Inc.
Defendant: BMW of North America, LLC
Case Number: 4:2022cv00574
Filed: July 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sean D Jordan
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2022 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Aspiration Innovation, Inc. to 9/18/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(mcg)
August 18, 2022 Filing 7 Plaintiff's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer Complaint re Aspiration Innovation, Inc..( Anderson, Kirk) (Main Document 7 replaced on 8/19/2022 with flattened image) (mcg).
August 10, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aspiration Innovation, Inc.. BMW of North America, LLC served on 7/29/2022, answer due 8/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es))(Anderson, Kirk)
August 8, 2022 Filing 5 ***FILING ERROR - ATTORNEY TO REFILE - PLEASE IGNORE*** AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on BMW of North America, LLC on 7/29/2022, filed by Aspiration Innovation, Inc.. (Anderson, Kirk) Modified on 8/8/2022 (mcg, ).
August 8, 2022 NOTICE of Deficiency regarding #5 Affidavit of Service for Summons: INCORRECT DOCKET EVENT. Correction should be made by ONE BUSINESS DAY. (mcg)
July 13, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to BMW of North America, LLC. (mmc)
July 8, 2022 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Aspiration Innovation, Inc. (Anderson, Kirk)
July 8, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Anderson, Kirk)
July 8, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against BMW of North America, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9010354.), filed by Aspiration Innovation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Anderson, Kirk)
July 8, 2022 Case Assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (mcg)
July 8, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mcg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aspiration Innovation, Inc. v. BMW of North America, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aspiration Innovation, Inc.
Represented By: Kirk Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BMW of North America, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?