Interactive Media Networks LLC v. Cellco Partnership
Plaintiff: Interactive Media Networks LLC
Defendant: Cellco Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless
Case Number: 4:2022cv00611
Filed: July 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Amos L Mazzant
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2022 NOTICE of Deficiency regarding the #6 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint submitted by Cellco Partnership. The Second Application should be filed closer to the deadline of the First Application deadline. Correction should be made by one business day. (rpc, )
August 23, 2022 Filing 6 ***FILED IN ERROR. PLEASE DISREGARD*** Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Cellco Partnership.( Dacus, Deron) Modified on 8/24/2022 (rpc, ).
August 23, 2022 Filing 5 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Cellco Partnership.( Dacus, Deron)
August 23, 2022 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Cellco Partnership to 10/6/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( rpc, )
August 9, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Cellco Partnership. (rpc, )
July 19, 2022 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Interactive Media Networks LLC (Anderson, Kirk)
July 19, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Anderson, Kirk)
July 19, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9026166.), filed by Interactive Media Networks LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Anderson, Kirk)
July 19, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (rpc, )
July 19, 2022 Case Assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (rpc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Interactive Media Networks LLC v. Cellco Partnership
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Interactive Media Networks LLC
Represented By: Kirk Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cellco Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless
Represented By: Deron R Dacus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?