Stroup v. CKJ Trucking LP
| James Stroup |
| CKJ Trucking LP |
| 4:2022cv00629 |
| July 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sean D Jordan |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE by CKJ Trucking LP Defendant's Certificate of Interested Persons (Ross, John) |
Filing 7
ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/26/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 10/12/2022 02:00 PM in Ctrm 105 (Plano) before District Judge Sean D. Jordan. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 8/22/2022. (daj, )
|
| Filing 6 DEFENDANTS ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND JURY DEMAND ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by CKJ Trucking LP.(Ross, John) |
| Filing 5 ***DEFICIENT DOCUMENT - PLEASE DISREGARD*** DEFENDANT'S ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND JURY DEMAND ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by CKJ Trucking LP.(Ross, John) Modified on 8/16/2022 (daj, ). |
| NOTICE of Deficiency regarding document #5 submitted by CKJ Trucking LP. Document references incorrect filing division. Correction should be made by one business day. (daj, ) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to CKJ Trucking LP. (daj, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (daj, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (daj, ) |
| Filing 3 ***DEFICIENT FILING - PLEASE DISREGARD*** Summons Returned Unexecuted by James Stroup as to All Defendants. (Walters, Jonathan) Modified on 7/25/2022 (daj, ). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by James Stroup Certificate of Interested Parties (Walters, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9033482.), filed by James Stroup. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Walters, Jonathan) (Attachment 2 replaced on 7/25/2022) (daj, ). Modified on 7/25/2022 (replaced Civil Cover Sheet with flattened image) (daj, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stroup v. CKJ Trucking LP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Stroup | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan James Walters |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CKJ Trucking LP | |
| Represented By: | John LeRoy Ross |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
