Mishkoff v. Redleo Software Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Henry Mishkoff
Defendant: Redleo Software Inc., Altitude Staffing, Inc. and Vertican Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2022cv00763
Filed: September 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Amos L Mazzant
Referring Judge: Christine A Nowak
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2022 Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss by Redleo Software Inc.. Responses due by 11/10/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Hersh, Barry)
October 26, 2022 Filing 16 SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint MOTION to Bifurcate Alternatively filed by Henry Mishkoff. (mcg, )
October 25, 2022 Filing 15 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint MOTION to Bifurcate Alternatively filed by Altitude Staffing, Inc.. (Tran, Trang)
October 20, 2022 Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Henry Mishkoff. Redleo Software Inc. waiver sent on 10/18/2022, answer due 12/17/2022. (mcg)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER denying #12 Motion to Reconsider Denial of Permission to E-File. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 10/19/2022. (mcg)
October 18, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION for Reconsideration re #8 Order by Henry Mishkoff. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(mcg)
October 18, 2022 Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint MOTION to Bifurcate Alternatively filed by Henry Mishkoff. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(mcg)
October 18, 2022 Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Henry Mishkoff. Vertican Technologies, Inc. waiver sent on 9/7/2022, answer due 11/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(mcg)
October 14, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint, MOTION to Bifurcate Alternatively by Altitude Staffing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Ed Koch, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Tran, Trang)
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting in part and denying in part #6 Motion for Permission to E-File. ORDERED that pro se Plaintiff Henry Mishkoff's Motion for Permission to E-File [Dkt. 6] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Clerk of Court shall add Plaintiff's email address, HankMishkoff@gmail.com, to the electronic service list. The addition of Plaintiff's email address to the electronic list in no way allows him to file electronically and in no way entitles him to a user ID and access to the Electronic Filing System. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 9/19/2022. (kls, )
September 9, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION for Permission to E-File by Henry Mishkoff. (mcg)
September 6, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Vertican Technologies, Inc. (mcg)
September 6, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Altitude Staffing, Inc. (mcg)
September 6, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Redleo Software Inc. (mcg)
September 6, 2022 Filing 2 Case Assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and referred to Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Referral) (mcg)
September 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Altitude Staffing, Inc., Redleo Software Inc., Vertican Technologies, Inc., filed by Henry Mishkoff. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(mcg)
September 6, 2022 Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 6-61705 (wea, )
September 6, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. **Consent form mailed to Plaintiff** (mcg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mishkoff v. Redleo Software Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Henry Mishkoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Redleo Software Inc.
Represented By: Barry S. Hersh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Altitude Staffing, Inc.
Represented By: Trang Quoc Tran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vertican Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?