Optinetix (Israel) Ltd. v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
Counter Defendant: Optinetix (Israel) Ltd.
Counter Claimant: Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2022cv00857
Filed: October 5, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Amos L Mazzant
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss. Response due by 11/25/2022. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/28/2022. (rpc, )
November 28, 2022 Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION to Stay all Deadlines by Optinetix (Israel) Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Anderson, Kirk)
November 17, 2022 Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Optinetix (Israel) Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Anderson, Kirk)
November 17, 2022 Filing 11 ***DEFICIENT DOCUMENT - PLEASE DISREGARD***Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Optinetix (Israel) Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Anderson, Kirk) Modified on 11/17/2022 (baf, ).
November 17, 2022 NOTICE of Deficiency regarding the MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS submitted DOCUMNET #11 - NO CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE. Correction should be made by ONE BUSINESS DAY (baf, )
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. This case is SET for the Initial Rule 16 Management Conference on 1/12/2023 at 1:30 PM in Ctrm 208 (Sherman) before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III. Rule 26 Meeting Joint Report due by 12/15/2022. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/15/2022. (baf, )
November 4, 2022 Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Family Dollar Stores, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Dollar Tree, Inc. for Family Dollar Stores, Inc., Family Dollar Stores, Inc.. (Wyatt, Lance)
November 4, 2022 Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, , COUNTERCLAIM against Optinetix (Israel) Ltd. by Family Dollar Stores, Inc..(Wyatt, Lance)
November 4, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Family Dollar Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wyatt, Lance)
November 4, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Neil J McNabnay on behalf of Family Dollar Stores, Inc. (McNabnay, Neil)
November 4, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, )
November 1, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Optinetix (Israel) Ltd.. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. served on 10/14/2022, answer due 11/4/2022. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es))(Anderson, Kirk)
October 5, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Family Dollar Stores, Inc.. (baf, )
October 5, 2022 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Optinetix (Israel) Ltd. (Anderson, Kirk)
October 5, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Anderson, Kirk)
October 5, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Family Dollar Stores, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9163516.), filed by Optinetix (Israel) Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Anderson, Kirk)
October 5, 2022 Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (baf, )
October 5, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Optinetix (Israel) Ltd. v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Optinetix (Israel) Ltd.
Represented By: Kirk Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
Represented By: Adil A. Shaikh
Represented By: Neil J McNabnay
Represented By: Lance Eric Wyatt, Jr
Represented By: Ricardo Joel Bonilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?