Spence v. Director, TDCJ-CID
| Kenneth Edward Spence |
| Director, TDCJ-CID |
| 4:2022cv00858 |
| October 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Christine A Nowak |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Pay Filing Fee. Petitioner shall pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, together with an in forma pauperis data sheet reflecting Petitioner's last six months of financial activity from the inmate trust account, within thirty days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 11/15/2022. (baf, )
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Remit the Filing Fee by Kenneth Edward Spence. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Envelope(s))(baf, ) |
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Kenneth Edward Spence as to #3 Order. (baf, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER. It is accordingly ORDERED that Petitioner has thirty days from the receipt of this Order to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, together with an in forma pauperis data sheet reflecting Petitioner's last six months of financial activity from the inmate trust account. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall not accept any other documents in this case, except for a motion for an extension of time, until Petitioner complies with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 10/14/2022. (baf, )
|
| Filing 2 Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak. (Attachments: #1 MAGISTRATE REFERRAL) (baf, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee NOT PAID), filed by Kenneth Edward Spence. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Envelope(s))(baf, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Spence v. Director, TDCJ-CID | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kenneth Edward Spence | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID | |
| Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
