Henry et al v. Canimex, Inc.
| James Henry and Marilyn Henry |
| Canimex, Inc. |
| 4:2022cv00915 |
| October 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Submission of Proposed Agreed Docket Control/Scheduling order by James Henry . (Marks, James) |
| Filing 14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Marks, James) |
| Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by James Henry. (Marks, James) Modified text on 12/21/2022 (mmc). |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by James Henry Plaintiffs' Notice of Initial Disclosures (Marks, James) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Canimex, Inc. Initial Disclosures (Feemster, William) |
| Filing 10 Plaintiffs' Certificate of Interested Persons by filed by James Henry, Marilyn Henry (Marks, James) |
| Filing 9 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Canimex, Inc., filed by filed by James Henry, Marilyn Henry.(Marks, James) |
| Filing 8 Original ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint Subject to its 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss by Canimex, Inc..(Feemster, William) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Original Complaint by Canimex, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order of Dismissal)(Feemster, William) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Canimex, Inc., filed by filed by James Henry, Marilyn Henry.(Marks, James) |
Filing 5
ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/20/2022. Rule 16 Management Conference set for 1/4/2023 at 10:30 AM in Ctrm 208 (Sherman) before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/15/2022. (mmc)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER AND ADVISORY. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/1/2022. (mmc)
|
| Filing 3 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT*** ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Canimex, Inc.(rpc, ) |
| Filing 2 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT*** COMPLAINT against Canimex, Inc., filed by James Henry, Marilyn Henry.(rpc, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Canimex, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9198335), filed by Canimex, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Party Index, #3 State Court Docket, #4 Plaintiffs' Original Petition, #5 Plaintiffs' Amended Petition, #6 Defendant's Original Answer, #7 Index of Attorneys of Record, #8 Jury Demand Status, #9 State Court Information Sheet)(Feemster, William) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (rpc, ) |
| Note: Pursuant to Local Rule CV 7(j), any motions pending in another federal or state court made by any party will be considered moot at the time of transfer or removal unless they are re-urged in this court. (rpc, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (rpc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
