Ruiz v. Anderson
| Adrian Ruiz |
| Bregoree Anderson |
| 4:2022cv01059 |
| December 19, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sean D Jordan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/17/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 4/5/2023 11:00 AM in Ctrm 105 (Plano) before District Judge Sean D. Jordan. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 2/10/2023. (daj, )
|
| Filing 9 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Bregoree Anderson. (Curley, Kevin) |
| Filing 8 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint & Assertion of Defenses, Including Qualified Immunity by Bregoree Anderson.(Curley, Kevin) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Bregoree Anderson.( Curley, Kevin) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Bregoree Anderson to 2/7/2023. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( daj, ) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Adrian Ruiz. Bregoree Anderson served on 1/3/2023, answer due 1/24/2023. (Roberts, James) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Bregoree Anderson. (daj, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (daj, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (daj, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Scott H Palmer on behalf of Adrian Ruiz (Palmer, Scott) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Breanta Boss on behalf of Adrian Ruiz (Boss, Breanta) |
| Filing 2 Additional Attachments to Main Document: #1 . (Roberts, James) Modified on 12/20/2022 (daj, ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bregoree Anderson ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9276842.), filed by Adrian Ruiz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Roberts, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ruiz v. Anderson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Adrian Ruiz | |
| Represented By: | Breanta Boss |
| Represented By: | Scott H Palmer |
| Represented By: | James Painter Roberts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bregoree Anderson | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Michael Curley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
