Starr v. JDFW (Vantage) LLC
| David Starr |
| JDFW (Vantage) LLC |
| 4:2023cv00350 |
| April 20, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sean D Jordan |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE: Stipulation of Dismissal: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this civil case is dismissed with prejudice. The clerk will close and terminate this matter. (bss, ) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by David Starr. (Cohen, Justin) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Stephen P. Demm on behalf of JDFW (Vantage) LLC. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9588120. (Demm, Stephen) |
Filing 12
ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/11/2023. Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 8/30/2023 11:00 AM in Ctrm 105 (Plano) before District Judge Sean D. Jordan. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 7/7/2023. (daj, )
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by JDFW (Vantage) LLC.(Bowen, James) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Unopposed Motion for Second Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading. It is further ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint, (Dkt. #1 ), is extended to July 5, 2023. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 06/20/2023. (jmb)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: JDFW (Vantage) LLC answer due 7/5/2023. (jmb) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Defendant's Unopposed Motion For Second Extension of Time To File Responsive Pleading by JDFW (Vantage) LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bowen, James) |
| Filing 8 ***APPLICATION CANNOT BE GRANTED BY CLERK PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE CV-12*** Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re JDFW (Vantage) LLC.( Bowen, James) (Main Document 8 replaced with flattened image on 6/15/2023) (daj, ). Modified on 6/15/2023 (daj, ). |
Filing 7
ORDER Upon consideration of Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading, (Dkt. #5 ), the Court concludes that the motion should be granted. It is therefore ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and the new deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint, (Dkt. #1 ), is June 14, 2023. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 5/16/2023. (psm)
|
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for JDFW (Vantage) LLC to 6/14/2023. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( daj, ) |
| Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re JDFW (Vantage) LLC.( Bowen, James) |
| NOTICE of Deficiency regarding #5 Motion for Extension submitted by JDFW (Vantage) LLC. Incorrect docketing event. To be refiled using the Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. (wea, ) |
| Filing 5 ***DEFICIENCT DOCUMENT. PLEASE DISREGARD.***Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Defendant's Unopposed Motion For Extension of Time To File Responsive Pleading by JDFW (Vantage) LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bowen, James) Modified on 5/15/2023 (wea, ). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Starr. JDFW (Vantage) LLC served on 4/24/2023, answer due 5/15/2023. (Cohen, Justin) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to JDFW (Vantage) LLC. (daj, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (jmb) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (jmb) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Cohen, Justin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JDFW (Vantage) LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9461907.), filed by David Starr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Trademark registration, #2 Exhibit 2 - Cease and desist letter, #3 Exhibit 3 - Response letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cohen, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Starr v. JDFW (Vantage) LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Starr | |
| Represented By: | Justin S. Cohen |
| Represented By: | Sara Babineaux |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JDFW (Vantage) LLC | |
| Represented By: | James W Bowen |
| Represented By: | Stephen P. Demm |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.