Scheopner v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
| Jared Scheopner |
| ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 4:2023cv00436 |
| May 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Submission of Proposed Agreed Docket Control/Scheduling order by Jared Scheopner . (Clark, Stephen) |
Filing 5
ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 7/10/2023. Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 7/25/2023 11:30 AM in Ctrm 208 (Sherman) before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 6/5/2023. (daj, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER AND ADVISORY. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 05/18/2023. (jmb)
|
| Filing 3 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT*** ANSWER to #2 PETITION by ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY. (jmb) |
| Filing 2 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT*** PETITION against ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, filed by Jared Scheopner. (jmb) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (jmb) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (jmb) |
| Note: Pursuant to Local Rule CV 7(j), any motions pending in another federal or state court made by any party will be considered moot at the time of transfer or removal unless they are re-urged in this court. (jmb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY from 471st Judicial District, Collin County, Texas, case number 471-01934-2023. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9497868), filed by ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Civil Court Sheet, #3 Exhibit A- Index, #4 Exhibit B- State Court Civil Docket Sheet, #5 Exhibit C- Documents filed with State Court, #6 Exhibit D- Notice of Removal To State Court, #7 Exhibit E- Certificate of Interested Persons)(Deguerre, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Scheopner v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jared Scheopner | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Rohl Clark, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Anthony Deguerre |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
