MuTag Tracking LLC v. Apple Inc.
Plaintiff: MuTag Tracking LLC
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Case Number: 4:2023cv00674
Filed: July 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sean D Jordan
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Catherine Susan Bartles on behalf of MuTag Tracking LLC (Bartles, Catherine)
August 4, 2023 Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Apple Inc. to 10/1/2023. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( slo)
August 3, 2023 Filing 8 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Apple Inc..( Smith, Melissa)
July 31, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MuTag Tracking LLC. Apple Inc. served on 7/27/2023, answer due 8/17/2023. (Antonelli, Matthew)
July 27, 2023 Filing 6 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by MuTag Tracking LLC (Antonelli, Matthew)
July 26, 2023 Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Apple Inc. (jmb)
July 26, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Zachariah Harrington on behalf of MuTag Tracking LLC (Harrington, Zachariah)
July 26, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Larry Dean Thompson, Jr on behalf of MuTag Tracking LLC (Thompson, Larry)
July 26, 2023 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Antonelli, Matthew)
July 26, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Apple Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9618537.), filed by MuTag Tracking LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 [379 Patent])(Antonelli, Matthew)
July 26, 2023 Case Assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (xl, )
July 26, 2023 ***DISREGARD ENTRY. DOCKETED IN ERROR BY CLERK. PLEASE DISREGARD***Case assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (jmb) Modified text on 7/26/2023 (jmb).
July 26, 2023 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (xl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MuTag Tracking LLC v. Apple Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MuTag Tracking LLC
Represented By: Larry Dean Thompson, Jr
Represented By: Zachariah Harrington
Represented By: Catherine Susan Bartles
Represented By: Stafford Grigsby Helm Davis
Represented By: Matthew J Antonelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Represented By: Melissa Richards Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?