Doe v. Frisco Independent School District et al
Jane Doe |
Frisco Independent School District, Frisco Police Department and John Hoover |
4:2023cv00768 |
August 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Sherman Office |
Amos L Mazzant |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by John Hoover as to #9 Memorandum & Opinion. (jmb, ) |
Filing 11 JOINT MOTION for Extension of the 26(f) conference and Notice of Consent to Magistrate Judge re #6 Order Governing Proceedings, by Frisco Independent School District. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order granting Joint Motion)(Walker, Meredith) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that #4 the Frisco Police Department's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is hereby GRANTED. Jane Doe's claims against the Frisco Police Department are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 09/25/2023. (jmb) |
Filing 6 ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/13/2023. Rule 16 Management Conference SET for 10/31/2023 at 11:00 AM in Ctrm 208 (Sherman) before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 09/08/2023. (jmb) |
Filing 5 ORDER AND ADVISORY re #1 Notice of Removal filed by Frisco Independent School District. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 8/29/2023. (baf, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Frisco Police Department. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Davis, Robert) |
Filing 3 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT*** ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Frisco Independent School District.(xl, ) |
Filing 2 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT*** COMPLAINT against Frisco Independent School District, Frisco Police Department, and John Hoover, filed by Jane Doe.(xl, ) |
Case Assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (xl, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (xl, ) |
Note: Pursuant to Local Rule CV 7(j), any motions pending in another federal or state court made by any party will be considered moot at the time of transfer or removal unless they are re-urged in this court. (xl, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Frisco Independent School District from 380th District Court of Collin County, Texas, case number 380-03836-2023. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9671251), filed by Frisco Independent School District. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet Attachment, #3 Affidavit/Declaration Certificate of Interested Persons, #4 Appendix Appendix of State Court Documents, #5 Exhibit Tab A - Docket Sheet, #6 Exhibit Tab B - Complaint, #7 Exhibit Tab C - Hoover Letter to Court, #8 Exhibit Tab D - Frisco Police Department Answer, #9 Exhibit Tab E - Frisco ISD Plea to the Jurisdiction)(Walker, Meredith) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.