Brooke v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Plaintiff: Anna M. Brooke
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2023cv00802
Filed: September 11, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Aileen Goldman Durrett
Referring Judge: Sean D Jordan
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 REFERRAL ORDER. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 and Local Rule CV-72, the undersigned hereby REFERS this case to U. S. Magistrate Judge Aileen Goldman Durrett for all pretrial proceedings. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 11/1/2023. (rpc, )
October 27, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (Nelson, Chad)
October 27, 2023 Filing 6 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Anna M. Brooke (Danaher, Philip)
October 27, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Anna M. Brooke Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures (Danaher, Philip)
October 9, 2023 Filing 4 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Nelson, Chad)
September 11, 2023 Filing 3 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT*** ANSWER to #2 Complaint by CVS Pharmacy, Inc.(xl, )
September 11, 2023 Filing 2 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT*** COMPLAINT against CVS Pharmacy, Inc., filed by Anna M. Brooke.(xl, )
September 11, 2023 Case Assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (xl, )
September 11, 2023 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (xl, )
September 11, 2023 Note: Pursuant to Local Rule CV 7(j), any motions pending in another federal or state court made by any party will be considered moot at the time of transfer or removal unless they are re-urged in this court. (xl, )
September 11, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CVS Pharmacy, Inc. from 471st Judicial District of Collin County, Texas, case number 471-04234-2023. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BTXEDC-9698138), filed by CVS Pharmacy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index of Matters Being Filed, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Citation, #4 Exhibit Petition, #5 Exhibit Defendant's Answer, #6 Exhibit State Court Docket Sheet, #7 Exhibit List of Counsel, #8 Exhibit Property Records)(Nelson, Chad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brooke v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anna M. Brooke
Represented By: Philip William Danaher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Represented By: John Anthony Scully
Represented By: Chad Michael Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?