Brooke v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Anna M. Brooke |
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. |
4:2023cv00802 |
September 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Aileen Goldman Durrett |
Sean D Jordan |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 REFERRAL ORDER. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 and Local Rule CV-72, the undersigned hereby REFERS this case to U. S. Magistrate Judge Aileen Goldman Durrett for all pretrial proceedings. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 11/1/2023. (rpc, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (Nelson, Chad) |
Filing 6 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Anna M. Brooke (Danaher, Philip) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Anna M. Brooke Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures (Danaher, Philip) |
Filing 4 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Nelson, Chad) |
Filing 3 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT*** ANSWER to #2 Complaint by CVS Pharmacy, Inc.(xl, ) |
Filing 2 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT*** COMPLAINT against CVS Pharmacy, Inc., filed by Anna M. Brooke.(xl, ) |
Case Assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (xl, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (xl, ) |
Note: Pursuant to Local Rule CV 7(j), any motions pending in another federal or state court made by any party will be considered moot at the time of transfer or removal unless they are re-urged in this court. (xl, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CVS Pharmacy, Inc. from 471st Judicial District of Collin County, Texas, case number 471-04234-2023. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BTXEDC-9698138), filed by CVS Pharmacy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index of Matters Being Filed, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Citation, #4 Exhibit Petition, #5 Exhibit Defendant's Answer, #6 Exhibit State Court Docket Sheet, #7 Exhibit List of Counsel, #8 Exhibit Property Records)(Nelson, Chad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brooke v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Anna M. Brooke | |
Represented By: | Philip William Danaher |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc. | |
Represented By: | John Anthony Scully |
Represented By: | Chad Michael Nelson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.