LHAGS, Inc. v. Blacklands Railroad, LLC
LHAGS, Inc. |
Blacklands Railroad, LLC, |
4:2023cv00829 |
September 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Amos L Mazzant |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS: Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 1/3/2024 at 11:30 AM in Ctrm 208 (Sherman) before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III.. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/9/2023. (ch, ) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Jani Mikel on behalf of LHAGS, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9774782. (Mikel, Jani) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Jeffrey J. Mayer on behalf of LHAGS, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9773261. (Mayer, Jeffrey) |
Filing 6 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2) Disclosure Statement identifying party citizenship filed by Blacklands Railroad, LLC, (Craddock, Michael) |
Filing 5 Defendant's Original ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Blacklands Railroad, LLC,.(Craddock, Michael) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by LHAGS, Inc.. Blacklands Railroad, LLC, served on 9/19/2023, answer due 10/10/2023. (Weitzel, Robert) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Blacklands Railroad, LLC. (jmb) |
Case assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (jmb) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (jmb) |
Filing 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by LHAGS, Inc. (Weitzel, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Blacklands Railroad, LLC, Successor to The Blacklands Railroad, a Texas corporation ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9709822.), filed by LHAGS, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Weitzel, Robert) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/19/2023: #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (jmb, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: LHAGS, Inc. v. Blacklands Railroad, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: LHAGS, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Robert Eilert Weitzel |
Represented By: | Jani Mikel |
Represented By: | Jeffrey J. Mayer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Blacklands Railroad, LLC, | |
Represented By: | Michael J Craddock |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.