Escarsega v. Fry
| Jaime Alejandro Escarsega |
| Officer Fry |
| 4:2023cv00898 |
| October 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Kimberly C Priest Johnson |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is therefore recommended that the case be dismissed without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Within fourteen days after service of the magistrate judges report, any party must serve and file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 11/29/2023. (xl, ) |
| Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Order #2 sent to Jaime Alejandro Escarsega returned marked "RETURN TO SENDER - NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED - UNABLE TO FORWARD" (xl, ) |
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Order #4 sent to Jaime Alejandro Escarsega returned marked "RETURN TO SENDER - REFUSED - UNABLE TO FORWARD" (xl, ) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Order #2 sent to Jaime Alejandro Escarsega returned marked "RETURN TO SENDER - REFUSED - UNABLE TO FORWARD" (xl, ) |
Filing 4
INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE ORDER. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. #3 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 10/13/2023. (xl, )
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jaime Alejandro Escarsega. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Balance Sheet)(xl, ) |
| Filing 2 Case Assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and referred to Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Referral) (xl, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fry, filed by Jaime Alejandro Escarsega. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(xl, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge.**Consent form mailed to Plaintiff. (xl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Escarsega v. Fry | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jaime Alejandro Escarsega | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Officer Fry | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
