Walag v. Viking Client Services, LLC
| Angela N. Walag |
| Viking Client Services, LLC |
| 4:2023cv01085 |
| December 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Kimberly C Priest Johnson |
| Sean D Jordan |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Notice: Notice of Dismissal: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), this civil case is dismissed with prejudice. The clerk will close and terminate this matter. (ldm) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Angela N. Walag (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 7
ORDER ON CLOSING DOCUMENTS. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall submit to the Court all papers necessary for the resolution of the claims between them no later than March 4, 2024. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all deadlines are STAYED until March 4, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 1/5/2024. (jmb, )
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by Angela N. Walag (Volheim, Nathan) |
|
Filing 5
REFERRAL ORDER. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 and Local Rule CV-72, the undersigned hereby REFERS this case to U. S. Magistrate Judge Kimberly Priest Johnson for all pretrial proceedings. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 12/20/2023. (jmb, )
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Viking Client Services, LLC. (jmb, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Nayeem Mohammed on behalf of Angela N. Walag (Mohammed, Nayeem) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Nathan Charles Volheim on behalf of Angela N. Walag (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Viking Client Services, LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-9858199.), filed by Angela N. Walag. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Volheim, Nathan) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (jmb, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (jmb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Walag v. Viking Client Services, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Angela N. Walag | |
| Represented By: | Nayeem Mohammed |
| Represented By: | Nathan Charles Volheim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Viking Client Services, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
