Artax, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al.
Artax, LLC |
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Research America |
4:2023cv01145 |
December 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Sean D Jordan |
Amos L Mazzant |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.'s, Samsung Electronics America, Inc.'s, and Samsung Research America's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement. Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.'s, Samsung Electronics America, Inc.'s, and Samsung Research America's deadline to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff Artax LLC's Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement is extended up to and including April 29, 2024. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/6/2024. (jmb, ) |
Filing 10 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Research America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Artax, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (USP 8107608), #2 Exhibit B (USP 8,509,412))(Key, Cecil) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Artax, LLC. Samsung Research America served on 1/8/2024, answer due 01/29/2024. (Key, Cecil) Modified on 1/25/2024 to add answer deadline to docket (jmb, ). |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Artax, LLC. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. served on 1/8/2024, answer due 01/29/2024. (Key, Cecil) Modified on 1/25/2024 to add answer deadline to docket (jmb, ). |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Artax, LLC. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. served on 1/8/2024, answer due 01/29/2024. (Key, Cecil) Modified on 1/25/2024 to add answer deadline to docket text (jmb, ). |
Case reassigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. District Judge Sean D. Jordan no longer assigned to the case. (jmb, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Samsung Research America. (jmb, ) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (jmb, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (jmb, ) |
Filing 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Artax, LLC (Key, Cecil) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-9889730.), filed by Artax, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (USP 8,107,608), #2 Exhibit B (USP 8,509,412), #3 Exhibit C (USP 9,514,368), #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Additional Attachment(s) Form AO120)(Key, Cecil) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (jmb, ) |
Case assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (jmb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.