R2 Solutions LLC v. Databricks, Inc.
| R2 Solutions LLC |
| Databricks, Inc. |
| 4:2023cv01147 |
| December 28, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Databricks, Inc..( Sacksteder, Michael)
|
Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Databricks, Inc. to 3/9/2024. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension. (jmb, )
|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Dargaye H Churnet on behalf of Databricks, Inc. (Churnet, Dargaye)
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jessica Andrea Martinez Kaempf on behalf of Databricks, Inc. (Kaempf, Jessica)
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Su Li on behalf of Databricks, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9937928. (Li, Su)
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Gregory Sefian on behalf of Databricks, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9937249. (Sefian, Gregory)
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Carder W. Brooks on behalf of R2 Solutions LLC (Brooks, Carder)
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher G Granaghan on behalf of R2 Solutions LLC (Granaghan, Christopher)
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Paul Murphy on behalf of R2 Solutions LLC (Murphy, John)
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Vigen Salmastlian on behalf of Databricks, Inc. (Salmastlian, Vigen)
|
Filing 6
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Databricks, Inc..( Sacksteder, Michael)
|
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Databricks, Inc. to 2/23/2024. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( baf, )
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by R2 Solutions LLC. Databricks, Inc. served on 1/3/2024. (Nelson, Edward)
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Issued as to Databricks, Inc. (jmb, )
|
Filing 3
Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by R2 Solutions LLC identifying Corporate Parent Acacia Research Corporation, Corporate Parent Acacia Research Group LLC for R2 Solutions LLC. (Nelson, Edward)
|
Filing 2
Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Nelson, Edward)
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Databricks, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-9890673.), filed by R2 Solutions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Copy of U.S. Patent No. 8,190,610, #3 Exhibit 2 - Claim Chart, #4 Exhibit 3 - Claim Chart)(Nelson, Edward)
|
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (jmb, )
|
Case assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (jmb, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.