Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. Carvana Operations HC LLC
| Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC |
| Carvana Operations HC LLC |
| 4:2024cv00037 |
| January 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (baf, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. CAME ON THIS DAY for consideration of the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice filed by Plaintiff Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC. In light of the Notice, is it hereby ORDERED that all claims asserted in this suit against Defendant Carvana Operations HC LLC are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 3/5/2024. (baf, )
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Beaty, Trevor) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Carvana Operations HC LLC. (baf, ) |
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equitable IP Corporation for Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC. (Beaty, Trevor) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Beaty, Trevor) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Carvana Operations HC LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-9920398.), filed by Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Beaty, Trevor) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
| Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (baf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. Carvana Operations HC LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC | |
| Represented By: | Trevor James Beaty |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Carvana Operations HC LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
