Thompson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
| Kimberly Thompson |
| JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association |
| 4:2024cv00051 |
| January 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association answer due 3/27/2024. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 3/12/2024. (rpc, )
|
| Filing 6 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Responsive Pleading by JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Perez, Courtney) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association answer due 3/13/2024. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/16/2024. (rpc, )
|
|
Filing 4
RECUSAL ORDER. The undersigned judge hereby recuses himself from this cause. Case reassigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III for all further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 2/14/2024. (rpc, )
|
| Filing 3 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleading by JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Perez, Courtney) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association. (dlw, ) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (dlw, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (dlw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-9930186.), filed by Kimberly Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cole, Kyla) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/22/2024) (dlw, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thompson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kimberly Thompson | |
| Represented By: | Kyla Gail Cole |
| Represented By: | Jane Legler Byrne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association | |
| Represented By: | Courtney Barksdale Perez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
