Smith v. Westerhoff, et al.
Plaintiff: Melissa Smith
Defendant: Ceus Westerhoff and Christian Reformed Church in North America
Case Number: 4:2024cv00086
Filed: January 29, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sean D Jordan
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2024 Filing 5 Notice of Dismissal: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), all claims between Plaintiff Melissa Smith and Defendants Ceus Westerhoff and Christian Reformed Church in North America are dismissed without prejudice. The clerk will close and terminate this matter. (ldm)
February 9, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Melissa Smith (Badders, Mariko)
February 7, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER. Plaintiff was required to file an amended complaint, alleging the facts required to establish diversity jurisdiction, no later than February 5, 2024. Plaintiff failed to do so. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff must file an amended complaint no later than February 14, 2024. The Court notes that failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal under Rule 41. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 2/7/2024. (jmb, )
January 30, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER. The Court ORDERS that, by no later than February 5, 2024, Smith must file an amended complaint that alleges facts sufficient to invoke this Court's jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 1/30/2024. (jmb, )
January 29, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-9945776.), filed by Melissa Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet - Melissa Smith)(Badders, Jeffrey)
January 29, 2024 Case assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (jmb, )
January 29, 2024 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (jmb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Westerhoff, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Smith
Represented By: Mariko Elizabeth Badders
Represented By: Jeffrey B Badders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ceus Westerhoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christian Reformed Church in North America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?