Holt v. Lumpkin
Petitioner: Alvin Holt
Respondent: Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Case Number: 4:2024cv00101
Filed: February 5, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Kimberly C Priest Johnson
Referring Judge: Sean D Jordan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Marta Rew McLaughlin on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin (McLaughlin, Marta)
February 13, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT OF SERVICE by Bobby Lumpkin through the Attorney General for the State of Texas regarding #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #4 Order to Show Cause - Habeas Petition - State, by Laura Haney on 02/12/2024. (xl, )
February 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - HABEAS PETITION - STATE. Respondent to file response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Copy of order to Edward Marshall and Laura Haney via electronic noticing including petition and any supporting documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 02/12/2024. (xl, )
February 7, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER re #1 . It is ORDERED that Petitioner has thirty days from the receipt of this Order to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, together with an in forma pauperis data sheet reflecting Petitioner's last six months of financial activity from the inmate trust account. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall not accept any other documents in this case, except for a motion for an extension of time, until Petitioner complies with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 02/07/2024. (xl, )
February 5, 2024 Case Assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan and referred to Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson. (xl, )
February 5, 2024 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (xl, )
February 5, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody, filed by Alvin Holt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dukes, Caitlin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holt v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Alvin Holt
Represented By: Caitlin Dukes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Represented By: Edward Larry Marshall
Represented By: Marta Rew McLaughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?