Gavin v. Makine
| Patrick Gavin |
| Erkur Makine |
| 4:2024cv00154 |
| February 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss by Patrick Gavin. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Circelli, Vincent) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Erkur Makine. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit/Declaration Declaration of Kenan Yavuz, #2 Proposed Order)(Pennell, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Erkur Makine, filed by Patrick Gavin.(Circelli, Vincent) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Enes Hajdarpasic on behalf of Erkur Makine. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number BTXEDC-10005914. (Hajdarpasic, Enes) |
Filing 4
ORDER AND ADVISORY. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/26/2024. (jmb, )
|
| Filing 3 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT*** PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against Erkur Makine, filed by Patrick Gavin. (jmb, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Amended Certificate of Service by Erkur Makine (Pennell, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Erkur Makine from 62nd Judicial District Court, case number CV45489. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-9992515), filed by Erkur Makine. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit docket sheet, #2 Exhibit citation for process, #3 Exhibit original petition)(Pennell, Kevin) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/23/2024: #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (jmb, ). |
| Case assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (jmb, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (jmb, ) |
| Note: Pursuant to Local Rule CV 7(j), any motions pending in another federal or state court made by any party will be considered moot at the time of transfer or removal unless they are re-urged in this court. (jmb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gavin v. Makine | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patrick Gavin | |
| Represented By: | Vincent Paul Circelli |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Erkur Makine | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Robert Pennell |
| Represented By: | Enes Hajdarpasic |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
