Syed v. United Healthcare of North Carolina
| Naqi Syed |
| United Healthcare of North Carolina |
| 4:2024cv00165 |
| February 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER AND ADVISORY. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/27/2024. (jmb, )
|
| Filing 3 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT*** DEFENDANT'S ORIGINAL ANSWER to #2 ORIGINAL PETITION by United Healthcare of North Carolina. (jmb, ) |
| Filing 2 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT*** ORIGINAL PETITION against United Healthcare of North Carolina, filed by Naqi Syed.(jmb, ) |
| Note: Pursuant to Local Rule CV 7(j), any motions pending in another federal or state court made by any party will be considered moot at the time of transfer or removal unless they are re-urged in this court. (jmb, ) |
| Notified Attorneys, K. Michael Sturgill, Philip Simpkins, and Nick Veach, Per GO 04-12, this court no longer accepts pleadings in paper form. The Clerk will no longer mail or fax notices or orders to parties. All notices and orders generated by this court shall be sent electronically. ***ATTORNEYS NOT ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN OUR COURT ATTORNEY ADMISSION LETTER SENT VIA EMAIL*** (jmb, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (jmb, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (jmb, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by United Healthcare of North Carolina from 481st District Court of Denton County, Texas, case number 24-0854-481. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-9997349), filed by United Healthcare of North Carolina. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration, #2 Exhibit State Court Docs, #3 Exhibit List of Parties and Counsel, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jubinsky, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Syed v. United Healthcare of North Carolina | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Naqi Syed | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United Healthcare of North Carolina | |
| Represented By: | Andrew George Jubinsky |
| Represented By: | Saheli Chakrabarty |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
