Pruvit Ventures, Inc. v. Rutherford et al
| Pruvit Ventures, Inc. |
| Michael Rutherford and Keisha O'Neal |
| 4:2024cv00307 |
| April 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sean D Jordan |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Retaliation Wrongful Termination |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 ***COMPLAINT FILED IN STATE COURT***COMPLAINT against Keisha O'Neal, Michael Rutherford, filed by Pruvit Ventures, Inc..(baf) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Keisha O'Neal, Michael Rutherford from 471 District Court, case number 471-00630-2024. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10078667), filed by Keisha O'Neal, Michael Rutherford. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Additional Attachment(s))(Conley, Phillip) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf) |
| Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (baf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
